Speaker summary
⁠76%2 analyzed articles/videos27 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph McCarthy results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 80% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 109.35 faulty-reasoning hits from 27 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 54% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,800 of 28,364 speakers). This Joseph McCarthy is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Joseph McCarthy
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠73%Joseph McCarthy (selected)54%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 27
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.5% percentile
54.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos27 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 90.0%90.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 80.0%80.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 40.0%40.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%False Dilemma: Speaker 90.0%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 80.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 5.3%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos