Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video119.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jorge Polanco results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Slippery Slope, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 274 faulty-reasoning hits from 119.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (17,933 of 26,616 speakers). This Jorge Polanco is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Jorge Polanco
Speaker details
Total words: 119.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.6% percentile
20.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos119.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 33.7%33.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 33.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos