Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathon Reed results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Out-Group Homogeneity Bias as the most egregious example at 72.4% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 385.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,762 of 28,364 speakers). This Jonathon Reed is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Jonathon Reed
Speaker details
Total words: 116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.6% percentile
54.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos116 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 72.4%72.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 72.4%72.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 54.3%54.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 36.2%36.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.2%36.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 72.4%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 72.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 54.3%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.2%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 36.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos