Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan E. Hawley results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 69% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 294 faulty-reasoning hits from 116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,277 of 28,364 speakers). This Jonathan E. Hawley is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Jonathan E. Hawley
Speaker details
Total words: 116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
31.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos116 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 69.0%69.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 34.5%34.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 69.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos