Speaker summary
72% 1 analyzed article/video 218.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Andic results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Quote-first Misdirection , and Begging the Question , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 55.8% saturation with 139.504 hits . Analysis detected 745.785 faulty-reasoning hits from 218.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (21,718 of 28,364 speakers). This Jonathan Andic is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Jonathan Andic
Speaker details
Total words: 218.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.4% percentile 15.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos218.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 55.8% 55.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 46.5% 46.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 21.7% 21.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 18.7% 18.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 18.1% 18.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 55.8%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst