Speaker summary
39% 5 analyzed articles/videos 489.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonah Goldberg results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 167 hits . Analysis detected 753.138 faulty-reasoning hits from 489.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,415 of 28,364 speakers). This Jonah Goldberg is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group. Jonah Goldberg
Speaker details
Total words: 489.667
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.9% percentile 7.8% BS Score5 analyzed videos489.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 20.5% 20.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 15.9% Composition/Division: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 0.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst