Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Golinger results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and False Dilemma, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 81.9% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 901.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,018 of 28,364 speakers). This Jon Golinger is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Jon Golinger
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
39.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos120 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 81.9%81.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 72.8%72.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 63.8%63.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 36.3%36.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 36.3%36.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 36.3%36.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 81.9%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 72.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 63.8%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 8.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos