Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jom Dolor results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, False Dilemma, and Indoctrination, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58.5 hits. Analysis detected 331.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,720 of 28,364 speakers). This Jom Dolor is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Jom Dolor
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.3% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos