Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Scott results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Representativeness Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,166 of 28,364 speakers). This John Scott is worse (more manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group.
John Scott
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 24
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

92% percentile
025507510092.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos24 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos