Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Rood results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Blind-Spot Bias, Middle Ground, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 50.3% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 203 faulty-reasoning hits from 107 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,597 of 28,364 speakers). This John Rood is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
John Rood
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 107
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.0% percentile
28.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos107 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.3%50.3%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 29.0%29.0%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 29.0%29.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.3%, sitewide 6.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 1.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos