Speaker summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Podhoretz results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Overconfidence Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 54.6% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 264.364 faulty-reasoning hits from 105 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,597 of 28,364 speakers). This John Podhoretz is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
John Podhoretz
Speaker details
Total words: 105
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510038.0% percentile
23.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos105 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 48.0%48.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 54.6%54.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 22.4%22.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 54.6%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 48.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos