Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video202 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Moolenaar results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Status Quo Bias, and Indoctrination, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 50.5% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 396 faulty-reasoning hits from 202 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (17,177 of 28,364 speakers). This John Moolenaar is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
John Moolenaar
Speaker details
Total words: 202
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510039.4% percentile
24.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos202 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.5%50.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 26.7%26.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 14.4%14.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Slippery Slope: Speaker 50.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos