Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video1,376.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Jones results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 323 hits. Analysis detected 2,380.946 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,376.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (28,026 of 28,364 speakers). This John Jones is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
John Jones
Speaker details
Total words: 1,376.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 5.7%5.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.6%15.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos