Speaker summary
36%1 analyzed article/video103.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Johnson results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 43.4% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 404 faulty-reasoning hits from 103.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27% and a BS Rank of 44% (15,988 of 28,364 speakers). This John Johnson is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
John Johnson
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 103.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.6% percentile
27.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos103.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 43.4%43.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 43.4%43.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 43.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 43.4%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos