Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Hinderaker results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 230.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,394 of 28,364 speakers). This John Hinderaker is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
John Hinderaker
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠43%John Hinderaker (selected)27%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510042.2% percentile
26.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos68 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 32.4%32.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 28.4%28.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.6%21.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 43.1%43.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.6%18.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 43.1%, sitewide 26.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 9.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos