Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video143.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John H Stubbs results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 312 faulty-reasoning hits from 143.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,395 of 28,364 speakers). This John H Stubbs is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
John H Stubbs
Speaker details
Total words: 143.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.6% percentile
16.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos143.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 33.5%33.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.7%16.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 33.5%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos