Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Goodman results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 114 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (9,129 of 28,364 speakers). This John Goodman is worse (more manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
John Goodman
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

68% percentile
025507510067.8% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos