Speaker summary
⁠58%2 analyzed articles/videos154.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John David Schwallier results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 46.647 hits. Analysis detected 233.891 faulty-reasoning hits from 154.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,612 of 28,364 speakers). This John David Schwallier is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
John David Schwallier
Speaker details
Total words: 154.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510030.9% percentile
19.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos154.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos