Speaker summary
76%6 analyzed articles/videos97 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Barrasso results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 94.5 hits. Analysis detected 130.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 97 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 70.7% and a BS Rank of 80% (5,801 of 28,364 speakers). This John Barrasso is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
John Barrasso

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
70.7% BS Score6 analyzed videos97 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 41.4%41.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate