Speaker summary
84% 1 analyzed article/video 316.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Wadford results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Quote-first Misdirection , and Optimism Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 52.6% saturation with 222 hits . Analysis detected 1,123.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 316.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.4% and a BS Rank of 28% (20,649 of 28,364 speakers). This Joe Wadford is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group. Joe Wadford
Speaker details
Total words: 316.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.2% percentile 17.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos316.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 52.6% 52.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 36.7% 36.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 38.1% 38.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 28.1% 28.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 23.5% 23.5% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 18.0% 18.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 52.6%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 7.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst