Speaker summary
ā 85%1 analyzed article/video745 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Morelle (D-NY) results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.6% saturation with 310 hits. Analysis detected 1,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 745 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ā 7% (26,379 of 28,364 speakers). This Joe Morelle (D-NY) is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Joe Morelle (D-NY)
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 7%Joe Morelle (D-NY) (selected)8%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 745
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751007.0% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos745 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 41.6%41.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 22.6%22.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 41.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 4.0%Primacy Effect: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos