Speaker summary
⁠73%2 analyzed articles/videos83 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Lamie results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 48.8% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 249.794 faulty-reasoning hits from 83 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (15,864 of 27,827 speakers). This Joe Lamie is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Joe Lamie
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 83
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.0% percentile
26.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos83 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 65.1%65.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 48.8%48.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 29.7%29.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 15.2%15.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 18.4%18.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 65.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 48.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos