Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video758.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joanna Page results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 1,287.89 faulty-reasoning hits from 758.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (27,333 of 28,364 speakers). This Joanna Page is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group.
Joanna Page
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠4%Joanna Page (selected)6%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 758.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751003.6% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos758.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.3%9.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.0%9.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos