Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video74.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joanna Becerra results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 70.2% saturation with 52.444 hits. Analysis detected 222.944 faulty-reasoning hits from 74.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (11,985 of 26,855 speakers). This Joanna Becerra is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Joanna Becerra
Speaker details
Total words: 74.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
37.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos74.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 64.3%64.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 70.2%70.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 26.8%26.8%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.9%17.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 70.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 64.3%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 0.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos