Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joan Alker results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 72.5% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 93 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,944 of 28,364 speakers). This Joan Alker is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Joan Alker
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
60.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 72.5%72.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 54.9%54.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 54.9%54.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Indoctrination: Speaker 72.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 54.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 54.9%, sitewide 19.2%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos