Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jinsong results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Representativeness Heuristic, and Begging the Question, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 72.7% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 117 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,990 of 28,364 speakers). This Jinsong is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Jinsong
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 33
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.3% percentile
44.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos33 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 72.7%72.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 72.7%72.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 72.7%72.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 27.3%27.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 72.7%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 72.7%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 72.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos