Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video207.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jimmy Fallon results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 441.314 faulty-reasoning hits from 207.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (23,043 of 28,364 speakers). This Jimmy Fallon is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Jimmy Fallon
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 207.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510018.8% percentile
13.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos207.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 52.2%52.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 9.7%9.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 52.2%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos