Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Newton results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 100 faulty-reasoning hits from 100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (9,112 of 28,364 speakers). This Jim Newton is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Jim Newton
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

68% percentile
025507510067.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos100 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos