Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video346.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Hallers results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 106.876 hits. Analysis detected 944.656 faulty-reasoning hits from 346.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (26,177 of 28,364 speakers). This Jim Hallers is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.
Jim Hallers
Speaker details
Total words: 346.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.7% percentile
8.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos346.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 25.9%25.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 14.2%14.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos