Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video56.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Deyermond results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Horn Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 61.4% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 184.267 faulty-reasoning hits from 56.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,535 of 28,364 speakers). This Jim Deyermond is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Jim Deyermond
Speaker details
Total words: 56.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510055.8% percentile
37.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos56.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 61.4%61.4%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 50.7%50.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.7%50.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 30.2%30.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 38.6%38.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.9%22.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 61.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.7%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Speaker 50.7%, sitewide 1.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos