Speaker summary
ā 59%1 analyzed article/video46.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jill Oliver results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 75.7% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 133.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41% and a BS Rank of ā 59% (11,638 of 28,364 speakers). This Jill Oliver is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Jill Oliver
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 59%Jill Oliver (selected)41%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 46.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.0% percentile
41.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.7%75.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 59.3%59.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Attempt to Sell a Productā€¦Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 21.4%21.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 59.3%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos