Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video642.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jez Stewart results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 638.795 faulty-reasoning hits from 642.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,852 of 28,364 speakers). This Jez Stewart is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.
Jez Stewart
Speaker details
Total words: 642.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.8% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos642.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Middle Ground: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos