Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jessica Luciere results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 62.2% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 62 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 45.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (10,716 of 28,364 speakers). This Jessica Luciere is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Jessica Luciere
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510062.2% percentile
45.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 62.2%62.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 37.8%37.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 37.8%37.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 62.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos