Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jessica Caloza results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 255 faulty-reasoning hits from 132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,754 of 28,364 speakers). This Jessica Caloza is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Jessica Caloza
Speaker details
Total words: 132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.5% percentile
27.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos132 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 31.1%31.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 31.1%31.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 31.1%31.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.1%31.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.1%31.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.9%18.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos