Speaker summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos212.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jessi Kingston results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 222 faulty-reasoning hits from 212.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,383 of 28,364 speakers). This Jessi Kingston is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Jessi Kingston
Speaker details
Total words: 212.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.6% percentile
16.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos212.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 11.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos