Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jess Asato results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 139 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (20,725 of 28,364 speakers). This Jess Asato is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Jess Asato
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠27%Jess Asato (selected)18%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 139
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510026.9% percentile
17.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos139 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.6%21.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos