Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video88.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jerry Helm results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 61% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 269 faulty-reasoning hits from 88.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,160 of 27,852 speakers). This Jerry Helm is better (less manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Jerry Helm
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 88.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510045.6% percentile
28.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos88.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 61.0%61.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 39.0%39.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.5%30.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 19.5%19.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 19.5%19.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.5%19.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 19.5%19.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.5%19.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 61.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.5%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos