Speaker summary
ā 70%1 analyzed article/video74.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jerri Winfrey-Carter results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 90.972 faulty-reasoning hits from 74.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.6% and a BS Rank of ā 53% (13,563 of 28,364 speakers). This Jerri Winfrey-Carter is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Jerri Winfrey-Carter
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 53%Jerri Winfrey-Carter (selected)34%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 74.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
33.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos74.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 45.6%45.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 38.8%38.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 16.5%16.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 38.8%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos