Speaker summary
54% 1 analyzed article/video 174.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeremy Scott results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 61 hits . Analysis detected 274.483 faulty-reasoning hits from 174.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,625 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeremy Scott is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group. Jeremy Scott
Speaker details
Total words: 174.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.7% percentile 9.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos174.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 26.0% 26.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst