Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video186 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer van Laar results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 54.3% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 292 faulty-reasoning hits from 186 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,073 of 28,364 speakers). This Jennifer van Laar is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Jennifer van Laar
Speaker details
Total words: 186
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
22.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos186 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 54.3%54.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 54.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos