Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video125.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Stromer-Galley results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Actor-Observer Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 42.6% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 360.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 125.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,900 of 28,364 speakers). This Jennifer Stromer-Galley is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Jennifer Stromer-Galley
Speaker details
Total words: 125.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.9% percentile
27.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos125.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 46.8%46.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.4%23.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 46.8%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos