Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video333.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Napier-Pearce results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 540.908 faulty-reasoning hits from 333.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (26,999 of 28,364 speakers). This Jennifer Napier-Pearce is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
Jennifer Napier-Pearce
Speaker details
Total words: 333.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751004.8% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos333.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 6.1%6.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos