Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Lawrence results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 312 faulty-reasoning hits from 120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (11,724 of 25,883 speakers). This Jennifer Lawrence is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Jennifer Lawrence
Speaker details
Total words: 120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.7% percentile
37.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos120 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 40.0%40.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos