Speaker summary
⁠47%2 analyzed articles/videos195 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Custer results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Optimism Bias, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 307 faulty-reasoning hits from 195 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (24,009 of 28,364 speakers). This Jennifer Custer is better (less manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group.
Jennifer Custer
Speaker details
Total words: 195
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510015.4% percentile
11.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos195 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.1%16.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.0%10.0%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.0%No True Scotsman: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos