Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Cocohoba results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Pessimism Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 145 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (8,685 of 26,862 speakers). This Jennifer Cocohoba is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Jennifer Cocohoba
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

68% percentile
025507510067.7% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos