Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video21 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Araoz results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 63 faulty-reasoning hits from 21 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,010 of 26,731 speakers). This Jennifer Araoz is worse (more manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.
Jennifer Araoz
Speaker details
Total words: 21
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

93% percentile
025507510092.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos21 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos