Speaker summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jenna Leurquin results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Confirmation Bias , and Anecdotal , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 151 hits . Analysis detected 748.834 faulty-reasoning hits from 751 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (28,034 of 28,364 speakers). This Jenna Leurquin is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Jenna Leurquin
Speaker details
Total words: 751
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.2% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos751 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst