Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jen Phan results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 56.5% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 305 faulty-reasoning hits from 193 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (18,393 of 26,730 speakers). This Jen Phan is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Jen Phan
Speaker details
Total words: 193
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.2% percentile
19.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos193 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 56.5%56.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 28.5%28.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.6%2.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.1%18.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 56.5%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos