Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video272 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jen Kalt results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Authority, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 449.859 faulty-reasoning hits from 272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,935 of 28,364 speakers). This Jen Kalt is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Jen Kalt
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 272
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.1% percentile
13.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos272 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 26.8%26.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos