Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video24.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jem Sponzo results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 14 hits. Analysis detected 56 faulty-reasoning hits from 24.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,862 of 28,364 speakers). This Jem Sponzo is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Jem Sponzo
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 24.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.2% percentile
40.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos24.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 40.0%40.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing Effect: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos